Does the Bible still matter? Part 3

 

As I wrote in a previous column, I sent a survey to several churches in my area about their view of the Bible. By now, all the churches that were going to reply have done so, and the results – no surprise here – are that nearly all churches claim unreservedly that the Bible is God’s inspired word and the only guideline for their beliefs.

The exceptions are no surprise, either: The Jews view only the first half of the Bible, what many call the Old Testament, as inspired. Mormons respect the Bible, according to their own creed, only ‘insofar as it is translated correctly,’ which gives them an “out”: whenever you show them something in the Bible that contradicts the Book of Mormon, they claim mistranslation in your Bible. And there are many such contradictions.

The Catholic church claims to follow the Bible, but they also follow the edicts of their various councils, many of which came up with decidedly un-biblical doctrines.

• The First Council of Nicaea in 325 declared Jesus to be God (contrary to John 14:28 and many other passages.)
• The First Council of Constantinople in 381 decided the holy spirit is God (despite 1 Corinthians 8:5, 6.)
• The Council of Ephesus in 431 proclaimed Mary “the mother of God,” (ignoring Luke 1:32-35.)
• The Second Council of Nicaea in 787 decided people should be encouraged to venerate icons, directly contravening the first two of the Ten Commandments. (Exodus 20:1-5)
• The First Lateran Council in 1123 concluded, among other things, that priests needed to be celibate, actually fulfilling the warning prophecy at 1 Timothy 4:1,3; 1 Timothy 3:2.
• The Third Lateran Council in 1179 made churches tax exempt, placed a lower penalty on priests than laity for sins such as sodomy, and stated that a Christian’s word was to be taken over a Jew’s in a court case, contrary to Acts 10:34, 35.
• The Council of Trent in the mid 1500s condemned protestant movements as heresy; but the Second Vatican Council in the mid 1960s reversed that edict and promoted ecumenism, i.e., a Rodney-King-like plea of, ‘Can’t we all just get along?’ despite the warning at 2 Corinthians 6:14, 15.

But what about those churches who did reply to my survey, claiming that they respect and follow the Bible unreservedly?

 

The doctrinal statement forwarded to me from Roosevelt Community Church (which, I was told, is adapted from The Gospel Coalition Statement of Faith, and held in common with Way of Grace Church and Camelback Bible Church) includes this:

 

"Salvation is accomplished by Christ alone... Salvation is by means of grace alone... Salvation is through faith alone..." 

 

Yet Psalms 40:16 links salvation to magnifying Jehovah: "Let such as love thy salvation say continually, Jehovah be magnified." 

And James 2:24 says about faith: "You see, then, that it is by his deeds a man is justified, and not simply by his faith."

 

Furthermore, in his model prayer recorded at Matthew 6:9-13, Jesus gave us a beautiful, prioritized list of what we should be concerned about:

Our Father in the heavens, let your name be declared holy,
let your kingdom come,
let your will be done, as in heaven so upon the earth;
give us today our needed bread,
and forgive us our debts, as we also forgive our debtors,
and lead us not into temptation, but save us from evil.

The sanctification of God's name was Jesus' first priority. Our salvation, while not ignored, came way down the list.

 

I don't mean to pick on these churches, but if you're going to say you teach the Bible, teach the Bible.

 

I have had other responses I want to pass on, from different churches, but I'll save them for a future column.

 

Read part One of this series here. 

 

Feel free to leave a comment. To read other columns on this subject click here. 

Bill K. Underwood is the author of several books, all available at Amazon.com.You can help support this site by purchasing a book.